|
"The elements of the Jewish heritage that are hostile to non-Jews
have long been known to the
world, and anti-Semitic writings quote them at length. Until
recently few would have seriously asserted that these passages
reflect the opinions of Jews in our own generation. But, when religious
extremists inject a contemporary relevance into
these passages ... they acquire a new and dangerous significance.
They provide ammunition for anti-Semites, who can assert
that the true Jewish character is revealed not when Jews are
subjugated in Christian or Muslim societies, but precisely when
they are free. It is in their natural environment, not in subjugation,
that they dare disclose their true face, and the nations
of the world must redefine their attitudes in view of the strong
Jews rather than the impotent Jews." -- Yehoshafat
Harkabi,
former head of Israeli
military intelligence, p. 179-180
|

Courage to Refuse. Combatants' Letter, seruv.org,
(Israeli soldiers -- 376 -- who have refused to serve in the Occupied
Territories), March 2002
"• We, reserve combat officers and soldiers of the Israel Defense
Forces, who were raised upon the principles of Zionism, sacrifice
and giving to the people of Israel and to the State of Israel, who
have always served in the front lines, and who were the first to carry
out any mission, light or heavy, in order to protect the State of
Israel and strengthen it.
• We, combat officers and soldiers who have served the State of Israel
for long weeks every year, in spite of the dear cost to our personal
lives, have been on reserve duty all over the Occupied Territories,
and were issued commands and directives that had nothing to do with
the security of our country, and that had the sole purpose of perpetuating
our control over the Palestinian people. We, whose eyes have seen
the bloody toll this Occupation exacts from both sides.
• We, who sensed how the commands issued to us in the Territories,
destroy all the values we had absorbed while growing up in this country.
• We, who understand now that the price of Occupation is the loss
of IDF’s human character and the corruption of the entire Israeli
society.
• We, who know that the Territories are not Israel, and that all settlements
are bound to be evacuated in the end.
• We hereby declare that we shall not continue to fight this War of
the Settlements. • We shall not continue to fight beyond the 1967
borders in order to dominate, expel, starve and humiliate an entire
people.
• We hereby declare that we shall continue serving in the Israel Defense
Forces in any mission that serves Israel’s defense.
• The missions of occupation and oppression do not serve this purpose
– and we shall take no part in them."
Israelis
Accused of Killing Police in Cold Blood,
Sydney Morning Herald, April 1, 2002
"Israeli soldiers shot dead five Palestinian policemen in cold
blood in Ramallah, Palestinians said. They said the policemen were
found on Saturday, after Israeli tanks had rolled into the West Bank
city and smashed into the headquarters of the Palestinian President,
Yasser Arafat ... Palestinian sources said yesterday that Israel had
ordered the evacuation of all Palestinian security offices, compounds
and posts in the Gaza Strip. 'It seems that a wide operation in the
Gaza Strip is imminent, both from the air and ground,' a source said.
Employees of international aid organisations had reportedly been asked
to leave Gaza. Palestinian officials said four security officers had
been shot dead yesterday at a social club in southern Ramallah that
Israeli forces took over. The Palestinian Red Crescent said Israel
was preventing ambulances from evacuating Palestinians killed and
wounded by Israeli gunfire in the streets of Ramallah. 'Each time
the ambulances have been stopped by soldiers, who have threatened
our crews with guns,' a Red Crescent spokesman said. A senior Palestinian
negotiator, Hassan Asfour, said the five policemen found on Saturday
had been 'executed in cold blood. This is a clear example of the collective
execution policy adopted by the Israeli Government against the Palestinian
people.'"
A
Fighting Cry from Under the Boot. Palestinians Brace for More Acts
of Israeli 'Terror,' by Fadia Issam Rafeedie,
San Francisco Chronicle (San Francisco
Gate), March 3, 2002
"The Palestinian people have a storehouse of collective memory
into which they have begun placing their account of the 18-month-old
uprising against Israeli military occupation. In it will be a mental
film reel, replaying over and over the image of little Muhammad Al-Durra
collapsing into his father's lap as a stream of Israeli bullets -
made in America - pierce the protective shield behind which they tried
to take cover. There will be pictures from the mass funeral of the
five young boys, all from one extended family in Gaza, whom Israel's
'defense' forces blew to pieces with a mine planted near their schoolyard.
The historically Arab fields in the West Bank will by their barrenness
tell another story - that of tens of thousands of ancient olive trees
torn up by their roots by illegal Israeli settlers on a rampage to
strike at the symbolic and material heart of Palestinian agrarian
society. The last few weeks on the ground in Occupied Palestine will
add especially grim reflections, as soldiers from the one of the strongest
military in the world invaded refugee camps - whose families were
originally displaced by the same unrelenting enemy - tearing down
walls, holding civilians hostage in their kitchens and bathrooms and
blindfolding innocent men whose arms would later bear the dehumanizing
ink of the military's identification codes. For those Palestinians
who witnessed the occupation army's missiles flying through office
windows, cars and bedrooms to decapitate their chosen leaders, memories
build strategy. They will work to form an alternative leadership to
carry on the resistance rather than rush to a lopsided negotiating
table only to have some U.S. diplomat urge them (again) to trade complete
liberation from colonial rule for an Israeli-defined version of 'statehood.'"
Killing
Raises Questions about Israeli Tactics,
Washington Post, March 31, 2002
"Something nasty happened on the fourth floor of the British
Council building on a hilltop in downtown Ramallah. The bodies of
five Palestinian police officers lay on their backs and sides. They
had been shot in the head or neck, yet most of the blood on the wall
near them was splattered no more than two or three feet high, according
to a reporter who saw the scene. The killing of the five officers,
who had taken refuge in the building Friday, was the deadliest incident
during Israel's storming of Ramallah and the headquarters of Yasser
Arafat, the Palestinian leader ... The killings at the British Council
have struck particular fear in Palestinians because they suspect the
men were assassinated. Israeli officials said the men were killed
in a 'close firefight.' On Friday, at least 19 police officers with
the National Forces, a unit that handles traffic and border duty for
areas under Palestinian jurisdiction, had taken refuge in the building.
That night, Israeli tanks and armored personnel carriers roared up
to the seven-story structure, built in the mid-1990s, when peace between
Israel and the Palestinians appeared likely. At 10 p.m., gunshots
sounded. Maher Shalabi, Abu Dhabi television's bureau chief in Ramallah,
waited in his office on the sixth floor until dawn today while the
building shook from the blasts of stun and anti-personnel grenades
and the sharp staccato of rifle and machine-gun fire. Shalabi said
an Israeli soldier searching the television offices told him, 'We
killed five police.' This morning, Shalabi discovered the bodies on
the fourth floor. Shalabi said the five men had been hiding and were
executed or shot when Israeli soldiers rounded the corner into the
hall. There were no signs that the Palestinians had fired from their
last position. Their bodies were found in the hallway in front of
offices of the Center for the Dissemination of Democracy, but it did
not appear that they had tried to take refuge there."
Greek Parliament Speaker Accuses Israel of 'Genocide,'
Yahoo! News (from Associated Press),
March 31, 2002
"The speaker of Greece's parliament accused Israel Sunday of
committing genocide against the Palestinian people and called for
international intervention to protect them. 'This is a barbaric attack
on a defenseless people, whose only wish is to live on the land of
their forefathers,' Apostolos Kaklamanis said. 'The Greek people,
the government, political parties and parliament condemn this genocide
taking place in Palestine.'"
Mass
Arrests Create New Foes for Israel,
Tikkun (from the Guardian), March 17,
2002
"Hundreds of Palestinian boys and men, rounded up at gunpoint
in Israel's sweep through the refugee camps of the West Bank, were
left hungry and unwashed and were taunted by their captors during
a confinement that lasted as long as six days, the Guardian has learned.
The only apparent criteria for the mass arrests was that they were
Palestinian and male, aged between 15 and 45. The round-up has been
condemned by Israeli and international organisations - including the
United Nations - who say such sweeping arrests are a gross violation
of Israel's duties as an occupying power in the West Bank and Gaza.
The Israeli human rights group B'Tselem said that the army had 'lost
any moral compass,' and the Public Committee against Torture in Israel
said the detainees had been subjected to 'degrading and humiliating
treatment.' 'This is very bad and brutal,' said Hannah Friedman,
director of the Public Committee against Torture in Israel. 'You are
not allowed to arrest people withou! any real evidence. This goes
against all the conventions. They put numbers on arms, and closed
their eyes. This was only to humiliate all the men and the people
in the camps, and these mass arrests will make it more difficult to
make peace with this people later on. We are creating our own enemies.'
Amid the chaos of Israel's successive invasions of West Bank refugee
camps, it is uncertain how many boys and men were taken from their
homes. Israeli human rights groups have said the number may be more
than 2,000; Israel's army chief, General Shaul Mofaz, said
there were 1,500. What is clear, however, is that by the army's own
admission virtually none was a wanted militant, and the detainees
had no access to lawyers or humanitarian organisations during their
detention."
Live Report from
Ramallah. The Israelis Took Over My House, by
Maha Sbitani, Counterpunch, March
31, 2002
"CNN reported this morning: 'Israeli forces imposed a curfew
in Ramallah shortly before 2 p.m. (6 a.m. EST) Sunday, threatening
to kill anyone on the streets.' Anyone.
Yesterday at 5:00am I was awakened by what sounded like huge trucks.
When I looked out the window I saw several tanks. A half hour later
the Israeli soldiers rang the bell--we did not answer--then I heard
them coming up the steps after breaking down the main door. They pounded
the door to the house. My husband opened the door and was confronted
by huge guns pointed at us. They pushed the door open and distributed
themselves throughout our house and office. Over 50 heavily armed
soldiers were now in the office and home (which are adjacent). We
asked what they wanted and they told us to shut up and sit down ...
.As I was getting my laptop I heard a crashing noise, I ran back to
the house and found my husband on the floor with three guns pointed
at him. I screamed for the commanding officer, who finally came and
pushed them away. The soldiers were everywhere and doing whatever
they felt like doing, including urinating on the floor. I went to
the kitchen to get coffee and found olive oil spilled all over the
place. They were just being vulgar and uncivilized, and became extremely
annoyed when I complained about the barbaric behavior."
Britains
Wounded in West Bank,
Times of London, April 2, 2002
"Wiping blood from his shirt, the comedian Jeremy Hardy told
last night how Israeli soldiers in armoured personnel carriers opened
fire on international peace campaigners, injuring three Britons. Shaken,
the left-wing satirist said Israeli forces had waited until the group
of 150 peaceful campaigners came within feet of their vehicles yesterday
then opened fire into the road and wall in front of them, spraying
shrapnel and stones into the crowd. Among the injured was Kunle Ibidu,
32, a Londoner who went to negotiate with soldiers as the unarmed
group marched from the birthplace of Jesus to the West Bank town of
Beit Jala near by. 'As Kunle and the other negotiator came within
a few feet of the tanks the Israelis fired live rounds into the ground,'
Mr Hardy said. The comedian, best known for his appearances on the
News Quiz and other BBC Radio 4s programmes, was not hurt, but went
to help one Briton who had a shrapnel wound to his hand. 'People were
hit immediately, one Australian woman in the stomach, Kunle in the
chin, elbow and arms and a couple of men in the head,' he said. 'They
aimed towards journalists covering the march and hit one who was clearly
wearing press stickers. People started to move back very slowly but
the tanks moved towards us and kept firing even though people had
their hands in the air. No one was doing anything at all aggressive,
all the chanting and singing had already stopped. There were senior
citizens, and people from all countries and it was all non-violent.'”
Israelis
Kick CBS Out,
Washington Post, April 1, 2002
"Israeli forces expelled a CBS News television crew from Ramallah
on Monday as troops continued to occupy the West Bank city and search
for militants. The Foreign Press Association in Israel protested the
expulsion of the crew and the military's attempt to make the entire
city off limits to the media. Kate Rydell, the producer of the CBS
crew that entered Ramallah on Sunday, said they were packing their
gear Monday when about seven Israeli jeeps pulled up. "They took up
positions along the street with their rifles at the ready," she said.
'Two of them came up and asked to see passports.' She said the soldiers
said the area was a closed military zone and escorted the crew out
of the city. The soldiers did not confiscate any material or equipment
and made no threats, she said. Ramallah, the Palestinian Authority's
administrative center in the West Bank, was declared a closed military
zone by Israel last Friday, when the Israeli army occupied it after
a series of Palestinian attacks in Israel. But the measure was only
sporadically enforced, and journalists and other foreigners were able
to get in as late as Sunday morning. Israel has warned that foreign
journalists were at risk in the West Bank city."
American
Jewry to Launch Emergency Campaign for Israel,
JTA (Jewish Telegraphic Agency), April
2, 2002
"[Jewish American] officials say the Israel Emergency Campaign
will be larger, more centralized and more forceful than UJC efforts
on Israel´s behalf that started earlier in the 18-month-old intifada.
The previous effort, called Israel Now, has raised $90 million since
September, with each federation deciding independently whether to
do extra fund raising for Israel and how to allocate it. 'The difference
now is we´re calling on every community to get with the program,'
said Stephen Hoffman, the UJC´s CEO and president. 'We´re no longer
advising them, we´re no longer saying it´s a good idea. We´re saying
this is a must,' he added. UJC leaders are in ongoing meetings with
officials at the Jewish Agency for Israel, the American Jewish Joint
Distribution Committee and Israel´s Ministry of Finance to determine
how the new dollars will be allocated, Hoffman said. However, while
national leaders are forcefully pushing for full participation and
a centralized allocations approach, it is not yet clear whether every
federation will agree to participate. In recent years, issues of 'fair
share' — or how much each federation is obligated to contribute for
national and international needs — have been a major sticking point
in the functioning of the UJC, which is an umbrella for more than
189 Jewish federations. Hoffman said he does not expect federations
to object to participating in the campaign. He also said he thinks
their fund-raising goals will likely be exceeded."
The
War Looks Different Abroad -- and Maybe So Do the Facts,
Haaretz, April 3, 2002
"A journey through the TV and radio channels and the pages of
the newspapers exposes a huge and embarrassing gap between what is
reported to us and what is seen, heard, and read in the world - not
only in the commentaries and analytical pieces, but also in the reporting
of the dry facts. Israel looks like an isolated media island, with
most of the reporters drafted into the cause of convincing themselves
and the reader that the government and army are perfectly justified
in whatever they do. Some have actually been drafted - Yedioth Aharonoth
has started running a regular column by its reporter, Guy Leshem,
who reports with determination from the heart of the West Bank, straight
from his military reserve service. This is another step in erasing
the line between the defense framework and the editorial framework
that is supposed to report and criticize ... .On Arab TV stations
(though not only them) one could see Israeli soldiers taking over
hospitals, breaking equipment, damaging medicines, and locking doctors
away from their patients ... Foreign television networks all over
the world have shown the images of five Palestinians from the National
Security forces, shot in the heads from close range; one was apparently
the manager of the Palestinian Authority orchestra. Some of the networks
have claimed they were shot in cold blood after they were disarmed.
The entire world has seen wounded people in the streets, heard reports
of how the IDF prevents ambulances from reaching the wounded for treatment.
The entire world has heard Palestinian residents saying they can't
leave their homes because 'they shoot anyone in the streets.' The
entire world has heard testimony by Palestinian families who have
been imprisoned in their homes for 72 hours, in some places without
electricity or water, and the food is running out. There are also
reports of vandalism and looting. Maybe it's all mendacious propaganda
(though in some cases, the pictures speak for themselves) but Israeli
journalists have no way to investigate to find out the truth, whether
to deflate the stories, or confirm them. In the absence of that kind
of reporting, instead, over and over, we hear the worn out mantras
about how "the civilian population is not our enemy," and reports
on how the army takes such strict care not to harm civilians."
Cyprus
Parliament Condemns Israeli 'Genocide,'
Jerusalem Post, April 4, 2002
"The Cyprus parliament also accused Israel today of committing
'genocide' against the Palestinians and demanded the immediate withdrawal
of Israeli troops from Palestinian territories. In a unanimous vote,
the parliament adopted a resolution condemning 'clearly and unreservedly
the Israeli actions and the genocide conducted by the (Ariel)
Sharon government against the Palestinian people, which perpetuates
hatred and kills every prospect of peace in the region' ... Earlier
today, Turkey's prime minister accused Israel today of committing
"genocide" against Palestinians - an unusually harsh denunciation
from a country with strong ties to the Jewish state."
Trying
to Buck the News Blackout,
Haaretz (Israeli newspaper), April 6,
2002
"The latest storm was caused by a report broadcast on Friday
night and then rerun on Saturday night, on [Israeli TV] Channel Two's
news show. It showed an IDF force taking over a house in the Al-Ayida
refugee camp. During the briefing before entering the house, the soldiers
are told to break down the door with a hammer, and if that didn't
work, to use an explosive brick. That's what they do. The result:
The mother of the family is mortally wounded and lies on the floor,
bleeding. The children stand behind her, choking back tears. The father
tries calling an ambulance, but it is trapped between checkpoints.
The soldiers continue moving through the house, and break into the
next house by cutting through the wall. The daughter begs them not
to break the wall, but they ignore her. One of the family members
asks the soldiers a question, and is shouted at to shut up. To top
it all off, one of the soldiers says to the cameras, 'I don't know
what we're doing here. Purification. Apparently it's dirty here. It's
not clear to me what a Hebrew soldier is doing so far from home.'
The report's power lay in the matter-of-fact manner in which the incident
was documented. The soldiers did not depart from orders and regulations.
They did not intend to harm the woman or any of the residents. Nonetheless,
the results were tragic. Later, it was reported, the woman died. Immediately
after the report was completed, the IDF spokesman was swamped with
angry telephone calls from the most senior officers in the army. They
all asked, 'Is this why you stick us with the reporters?'"
Israel
and the Occupied Territories
(List of journalists attacked by Israeli troops), cpj,
April 5, 2002
"In October and November, CPJ documented nearly two dozen other
cases of journalists, most of them Palestinians, who were wounded
by Israeli army gunfire or beaten by Israeli security forces while
covering the political violence that erupted the day after Likud party
leader Ariel Sharon's controversial September 28 visit to the Jerusalem
shrine known as Temple Mount to Jews and the Noble Sanctuary (Haram
al-Sharif) to Muslims. Ten journalists were wounded by live rounds
or rubber-coated steel bullets fired by Israeli troops. In three other
cases, reporters on the scene blamed Israeli soldiers for shooting
journalists, although the source of gunfire was unclear. There have
also been numerous other unverified reports of journalists wounded
by IDF gunfire or assaulted by Israeli soldiers and/or militant Jewish
settlers. This spate of wounded reporters underscored the perennial
complaint of many Palestinian journalists, that Israeli soldiers not
only subject them to physical abuse, but are often criminally negligent
in cases where journalists are shot."
Israeli
Troops Throw Stun Grenades at Journalists,
CNN, April 5, 2002
"Israeli troops on Friday fired stun grenades and rubber-coated
bullets at a group of about two dozen journalists waiting for the
arrival of U.S. Mideast envoy Anthony Zinni at the compound of Palestinian
leader Yasser Arafat. According to CNN's Michael Holmes, two Israeli
military jeeps pulled up along with another unmarked car and ordered
the journalists to leave, but not all members of the group heard what
the soldiers said. At that point, about six stun grenades were thrown
into the midst of the journalists by Israeli soldiers. The members
of the media were again ordered to leave, Holmes said. A stun grenade
detonated under Holmes' foot as he fled the scene. No one was injured
in the attack. Stun grenades produce a blinding flash and a very loud
explosion, designed to disorient those targeted As the journalists
drove off in five armored media vehicles, the soldiers fired rubber-coated
bullets on them. Two bullets struck the back of the vehicle being
driven by the CNN crew, damaging a rear window. Some of the journalists
had their government-issued media credentials confiscated by the troops."
Turkey
Blasts Israel for 'Genocide,'
Gulf News, April 5, 2002
"Turkey's prime minister accused military ally Israel yesterday
of "genocide" against Palestinians and demonstrators marched in Muslim
and other countries as Israel vowed to pursue its drive to root out
suicide bombers ... .Muslim Turkey and Israel cooperate in a range
of security areas and, only last month, Turkey signed a deal for an
Israeli state defence firm to upgrade ageing Turkish M-60 tanks. But
public protests against Israeli military action in the West Bank have
grown in Turkey, and thousands of Turks took to the streets yesterday
for the third day running. About 2,500 people led by unions and civic
groups gathered amid a heavy police presence in central Ankara, shouting
'Damn Israel' and 'Murderer Israel,' witnesses said ... In Jakarta,
some 2,000 Indonesians hit the streets calling for an end to Israeli
military action, in the third consecutive day of protests in the world's
most populous Muslim nation. Thousands of protesters gathered outside
the office of the United Nations in central Jakarta shouting slogans
in support of the Palestinians."
International
Red Cross Says 'Unacceptable' Israeli Actions Curbed Its West Bank
Operations,
tbo (Tampa Bay, Florida), April 6, 2002
"The International Red Cross said Saturday that it had reduced
its humanitarian operations in the West Bank to "a strict minimum"
because of actions by Israeli forces, which it said have shot toward
ambulances and threatened workers ... The ICRC said actions by Israeli
soldiers were 'totally unacceptable, for it jeopardizes not only the
lifesaving work of emergency medical services but also the group's
other humanitarian activities.' 'Over the past two days, ICRC staff
in Bethlehem have been threatened at gunpoint, warning shots have
been fired at ICRC vehicles in Nablus and Ramallah, two ICRC vehicles
have been damaged by Israeli tanks in Tulkarem and the ICRC premises
in Tulkarem have been broken into,' it said in a statement from Tel
Aviv. Aleksandra Matijevic, a spokeswoman in Jerusalem, told The
Associated Press on Saturday that all the threats and attacks
came from Israeli forces."
Europeans
March for Palestinians,
Newsday, April 6, 2002
"Tens of thousands of activists marched through Paris and Rome
on Saturday in protests demanding Israel stop its offensive in the
West Bank and expressing solidarity with the Palestinians. More than
20,000 people marched in the French capital to the Place de la Bastille,
where hundreds of police stood by. Some protesters carried shredded
American flags and shouted slogans against Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon ... .In Rome, about 20,000 protesters marched through
downtown, ending up at a rally in Piazza del Popolo, where the crowd
swelled to about 50,000 people. A few marchers at the front of Saturday's
procession wore black face masks and bandanas like those worn by Palestinian
militants. Others carried banners calling for 'Intifada until victory,'
and chanted In Rome, about 20,000 protesters marched through downtown,
ending up at a rally in Piazza del Popolo, where the crowd swelled
to about 50,000 people. A few marchers at the front of Saturday's
procession wore black face masks and bandanas like those worn by Palestinian
militants. Others carried banners calling for 'Intifada until victory,'
and chanted for a "Liberated Palestine.' Italy's three main unions
and two major leftist parties, however, decided at the last minute
not to participate in the march, amid criticism of the protest by
Jewish groups. for a 'Liberated Palestine.' Italy's three main unions
and two major leftist parties, however, decided at the last minute
not to participate in the march, amid criticism of the protest by
Jewish groups."
Israel
Against the World,
Jerusalem Post, April 7, 2002
"As far as the braying dogs of war are concerned, Israel is now
- and has always been - the real problem in the region and the source
of all evil. In this topsy-turvy, irrational scenario, we might be
tempted to lose faith in our cause. After all, can we be right and
the whole world be wrong? And, even if we are convinced we are waging
a just and justified battle, can we successfully take on virtually
the entire international community? The answer, on both counts, is
a resounding yes. First, we have a long tradition of standing our
ground on moral and ethical issues, even if we stand alone. Indeed,
Abraham, the father of our nation, was known as a Hebrew, from the
word Ivri, which means, 'he who comes from the other side.' Abraham
stood on his side of the spiritual divide, smashing the idols of polygamy
and converting a reluctant world to the truth of one God. Later in
our history, we rejected the pantheistic hegemony of the Greek empire,
and rebelled against mighty Rome when it sought to crush our independence.
And in this century alone, we heroically withstood the 'War Against
the Jews' fought by Hitler and his many accomplices, and established
the State of Israel in the face of staggering odds. So we are no strangers
to struggles."
72%
of Israelis for War,
Jerusalem Post, April 5, 2002
"Seventy-two percent of Israelis support the government's decision
to wage wide-scale war in the territories, according to a poll commissioned
by The Jerusalem Post. The poll of 501 Israeli adults was conducted
yesterday by the Smith Institute, headed by Rafi and Hanoch
Smith. The margin of error was 4.5%. Additionally, a plurality
of Israelis - 36% - favor Yasser Arafat's expulsion from the territories,
while another 23% believe he should be 'eliminated.' Only 15% favor
a return to negotiations with him ... According to the results, were
elections held today, 32% would prefer to see Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon continue in office, slightly ahead of his nearest rival,
former prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who polled 26%. Both
men poll well ahead of Labor Party rival Binyamin Ben-Eliezer,
who enjoys a mere 4% support. Intriguingly, Sharon also polls
substantially better than Ben-Eliezer among last year's Barak
voters - a whopping 28% to 9% margin, while Netanyahu enjoys
a razor-thin lead over Sharon among last year's Sharon
voters."
Some Students at UC Berkeley Planning to Join Israeli Army,
Daily Californian, April 2, 2002
"A group of Israeli UC Berkeley students may soon be joining
the front lines of the stand-off between Israelis and Palestinians
in the Middle East. Citing a moral imperative and "a sense of duty"
to defend Israel, a country to which they hold dual citizenship with
the United States, the students said they plan to join the Israeli
army after graduating. 'Going to (the Israeli Defense Forces) is not
a nationalist thing, it's a moral responsibility,' said Micki Weinberg,
president of Akiva Movement, a student group that supports UC Berkeley
students who want to make the pilgrimage to the Holy Land ... .Although
citizens who live in Israel are required to serve up to four years
in the army, those living abroad may choose whether or not they want
to serve. 'It's not a requirement, it's something I want to do," said
UC Berkeley senior Oren Lazar, co-chair of the Israeli Action
Committee. 'I support the country, especially during times like this."
The United States awards dual citizenship with very few countries,
said Lt. Col. John Katz of UC Berkeley's Department of Military
Science. Becoming a soldier with the Israeli Defense Forces would
disqualify the students from becoming officers in the U.S. Military,
Katz said. But those considering joining the Israeli army said
they have no interest in joining U.S. forces."
[Israeli] Premier
Calls on Americans to Mobilize,
[Jewish] Forward, April 5, 2002
"Against a backdrop of recurring suicide bombings and a military
confrontation escalating into war, Prime Minister [Ariel]
Sharon called on American Jews this week to mobilize on Israel's
behalf and help it win the battle for world opinion. 'We see our relationship
with the Jewish Diaspora as part of our strategic strength,' Sharon
said Monday in a conference call to the Conference of Presidents of
Major American Jewish Organizations. 'We need you today,' Sharon said.
'There must be a supreme effort to contradict false accusations against
Israel. We need you to express public support, talk to people and
groups who influence public opinion, demonstrate your love and support
by visits to Israel.' The Israeli leader's appeal drew mixed responses
of determination and anguish from heads of the organizations he addressed.
Community leaders appeared determined to stand with Israel, yet uncertain
they could rally their members."
'That Weasel
Word,'
Al-Ahram, April 4-10, 2002
"[Tom] Paulin, currently professor of English at Hartford College,
Oxford, a leading poet and, for several years now, a controversial
TV pundit, is among the few British intellectuals who has dared to
criticise Israel, questioning even its very existence. 'I never believed
that Israel had the right to exist at all,' Paulin told Al-Ahram Weekly
. 'Paulin has become the rare thing in contemporary British culture;
'the writer as conscience',' wrote one critic. It is a position that
has led him into acrimonious public debates about his political views,
particularly in relation to the Arab-Israeli conflict. He recently
took up his pen in defence of Edward Said, berating Guardian columnist
Ian Buruma as a Zionist. Paulin makes no secret of his uncompromising
views on Israel. "You are either a Zionist or an anti-Zionist," he
says. 'Everyone who supports Israel is a Zionist.' Such Irish bluntness,
as one reporter described it, has made him a constant target. His
publication of the poem 'Killed in the Crossfire' in the Observer
newspaper almost a year ago caused an uproar within pro-Israel circles
with predictable consequences: the usual accusations of anti-Semitism
followed almost immediately. Paulin is not intimidated by such tactics.
'I just laugh when they do that to me. It does not worry me at all.
These are the Hampstead liberal Zionists,' he explains, 'I have utter
contempt for them. They use this card of anti- Semitism. They fill
newspapers with hate letters. They are useless people.'"
'Genocide' Comment Hits Turkish-Israeli Ties,
Jerusalem Post, April 7, 2002
"Turkish Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit's remarks that Israel is
carrying out a 'genocide' against Palestinians has led to a serious
crisis between the two strategic allies. On Thursday, Ecevit said
at a meeting of his party that not only PA Chairman Yasser Arafat
but the whole Palestinian nation is being destroyed step by step,
adding that genocide against the Palestinian people is being carried
out before the eyes of the world. Israel has launched simultaneous
diplomatic initiatives in Ankara and Tel Aviv to protest Ecevit's
remarks linking Israel's use of force to the genocide term. Israel
has asked Ankara for an 'explanation' of the comments, warning that
Ecevit's announcement could affect relations between the countries.
After Turkish Foreign Minister Ismail Cem also warned that ties may
be affected by the 'genocide' comment, Ecevit said his words were
misunderstood. They merely reflect his concerns over the events in
the Middle East, he added. This did not satisfy Israel, according
to Foreign Ministry sources who said they were deeply disappointed
... American Jewish lobbies, known for their support of Turkey in
the face of Armenian and Greek lobbies in Washington, are preparing
to voice their concerns to Turkey. They reportedly delivered a message
to the Turkish Embassy in Washington decrying Ecevit's statements.
They added that the comments are particularly unseemly in consideration
of their attempts to defend Turkey from Armenian claims of genocide,
and in light of the Jewish genocide suffered at the hand of the Nazis.
Last year, Jewish-American lobbies played a key role in stopping a
Congressional bill foreseeing an Armenian genocide law, urging US
authorities to allow arms sales for Turkey."
[Interview with Norman Finkelstein],
Flashpoints.net, April 6, 2002
"Norman: the settlements perform two strategic.. one,
they fragment the occupied territories into bantustands.. (about South
African apartheid).. two, they are located over the crucial water
resources.. now 80% of the water resources reserved for Israeli Jews..
under Oslo the number of settlers doubled from 200,000 to 400,000..
since Sharon has come to power 54 new settlements.. but Labor has
been more agressive in building settlements.. any lawyer can create
wiggle room.. the nature of language.. UN Resolution 242 was very
clear.. the first line, 'given the inadmissability of acquiring territory
by war'.. at the time of the resolution, every country in the world
weighed in.. about the passing of UN 242.. did not allow for settlements..
did not allow for wholesale confiscation of land.. Israel was clear
on 242.. Moshe Dayan didn't endorse 242, because he said, 'we would
have to withdraw'.. a CIA confidential study on the meaning of 242..
it has been leaked, I have a copy.. requires a full withdrawal on
all fronts.. allowed for minor and mutual swaps of land.. one can
make the argument, wiggle room on both sides.. but US media obsessively
supportive of Israel.. WHAT YOU'RE SEEING NOW, THE OBLITERATION OF
A POPULATION.. SEEING THE CULMINATION OF 30 YEARS OF PLANNING, OF
SETTLEMENT BUILDING.. Arafat and his corrupt crew.. Israeli hoped
in exchange for the perks of power, Arafat would go along with the
bantustans.. he didn't.. Dennis: about the separation between
church and state?.. Norman: I don't think it is possible to
resoncile the two principles.. democracy and Jewish ascendancy.. Israel
knows that, that is why they have never ratified a constitution..
I don't hold out great hopes for a two state solution.. THE PALESTINIANS
WANT THE ISRAELI VAMPIRES OUT OF THEIR LIVES.. AND I AGREE.. FOR 35
YEARS THEY HAVE DESTROYED THESE PEOPLE.. REDUCED THEM TO A STATE WHERE
DEATH IS PREFERABLE TO LIVING.. ISRAEL HAS TO TAKE ITS BAGS, PACK
THEM, AND LEAVE."
Thousands
March in Paris to Condemn Recent Wave of Anti-Semitic Attacks,
Yahoo News! (from Associated Press),
April 7, 2002
"More than 50,000 people marched in Paris on Sunday to denounce
a wave of recent attacks on Jewish schools, cemeteries and synagogues
in France, while expressing their support for Israel amid escalating
tensions in the Middle East. An estimated 1,500 police and scores
of anti-riot vehicles were deployed as marchers headed toward the
historic Place de la Republique, where scuffles broke out between
pro-Israel militants and a group of pacifist demonstrators at a separate
rally nearby. Police fired tear gas into the crowd to disperse several
hundred pro-Israel militants who arrived first at the square and clashed
with as many as 1,500 demonstrators at the rally by pacifists. Several
people were injured, including a police officer who was stabbed in
the stomach, police said, without providing further details. A group
of militant protesters attacked journalists and smashed their equipment.
An APTN cameraman was among those roughed up in the melee. Paris police
said about 53,000 people took part in the march ... 'The goal is to
battle against anti-Semitism in France and terrorism in the Middle
East, and to support Israel,' said Roger Cukierman, president
of the Representative Council of French Jewish Groups, known as CRIF,
in a telephone interview before the march."
U.S. Jews Cannot Acquiesce to Sharon's
Monstrous Behavior,
Los Angeles Times, April 9, 2002
"What does it mean to be Jewish? ... What irony that many Jews
now comfortably vacation in Germany but insist that Arab anti-Semitism
is an immutable aspect of Muslim culture that can be met only with
the crushing power of tanks. Not that anyone asked me, but those are
not my tanks careening around the West Bank bringing fear and havoc
in their wake. Yet they are marked as Jewish tanks and consequently
they and I bear some familial resemblance on my mother's side. I am
thus obligated to consider what cruelty is being done in the name
of defending my people. Some of us make a deliberate effort to disassociate
from the mayhem of Ariel Sharon's carnage, while others seem to wallow
in it, as if displaying the awesome firepower of the Israeli army
is necessary to the survival of the Jewish state. I would like to
think that the peacemakers still outnumber the militarists among U.S.
Jews, but my own e-mail and street-corner conversations no longer
bear out that hope. While Jews are hardly monolithic, even in their
views of Israel, their large presence in the media contrasts sharply
with a near total exclusion of Palestinian Americans. Palestinian
Americans in particular, and Arabs in general, are the ghosts haunting
U.S. newsrooms by their embarrassing absence. As journalists, we do
not know them as a people, we have little connection with their slights
and sorrows, and we can only, even with the best of intentions, experience
their suffering as an abstraction. While the family tales of Jewish
oppression during the pogroms of czars, the Holocaust and Soviet anti-Semitism
have been merged into the dominant American culture, horrific tales
of Arab suffering are systematically ignored."
French
Cameraman Shot in West Bank,
Las Vegas Sun, April 9, 2002
"In Bethlehem, Yuzuru Saito, a reporter with TV Tokyo, said soldiers
stopped him as he walked with a cameraman in the narrow alleyways
of the old city. The soldiers removed the tape from the camera. 'Then
he asked us to leave. He said 'You have one minute, if you don't we
will shoot,' and we left.' Saito told The Associated Press.
Also in Bethlehem, French cameraman Vincent Benhamou said he was interviewing
families in their homes. When he left one house, he came face to face
with Israeli soldiers. He said the soldiers were abusive and threatening.
The soldiers took his tape. 'They pointed their weapons at me, they
took the tape and asked me to leave immediately. I started walking
away then I heard two single shots in the air,' he said. The Israeli
military had no immediate comment on the incidents, but noted that
journalists were not allowed in Bethlehem. Several days ago the Israeli
military declared the town a closed military zone and banned reporters.
Also in Bethlehem, Givara Budeiri, a reporter for the Arabic satellite
TV channel Al-Jazeera, said she tried to leave Bethlehem because of
illness, but Israeli soldiers at a checkpoint barred her car from
leaving and fired at the ground. The army said it was looking into
the incident."
Israel Court Ruling Confirms Denial of Prisoners' Rights. Torture
Claims 'Extraordinary Measures' Permitted,
Financial Times, April 8, 2002
"The Israeli Supreme Court yesterday refused to overturn an army
order denying Palestinian prisoners legal rights, despite hearing
allegations of torture at a detention camp near Ramallah. The tribunal
threw out a petition from four Israeli human rights groups, which
quoted an Israeli source at the Ofer detention centre as saying detainees
were being subjected to torture during interrogation, including repeated
instances of them having their toes broken. In an order last Friday,
the army said detainees would not have access to lawyers during their
permitted period of arrest, which was at the same time extended from
eight to 18 days. Quoting testimony from the unidentified witness,
Sharon Avraham-Weis, lawyer for the petitioners, said: "Soldiers
dragged one man by the legs back and forth in the mud before standing
him against a wall, pulling him by the hair and banging his head against
the wall. 'The witness heard noises from nearby rooms that sounded
like heads being banged against a wall.' Blindfolded and bound, prisoners
were told they would be shown no mercy if they failed to name suspects,
according to the testimony. The army said that by the weekend 1,600
people had been rounded up throughout the West Bank. It said that
800 had since been released, although human rights groups have so
far been unable to contact them. Malchiel Blas, government lawyer,
defending the army's ban on legal representation, said: 'The army
is subject to unprecedented conditions that make it impossible for
us to work according to the norms.' Rejecting the human rights groups'
request for a restraining order against the army, Shlomo Levine,
chairman of the Supreme Court tribunal, said the panel accepted the
state's argument that the present circumstances justified extraordinary
measures."
Extremism
in Defense of Liberty,
by Paul Gottfried, The Spectator (UK),
April 6, 2002
"Recently I was shown the text of an interview with General Ariel
Sharon, the current Israeli premier, conducted in December 1982.
The comments are worth considering because the problems stressed in
this interview continue to plague the Israeli government and its people
... .The interviewer, a self-proclaimed Israeli dove (and talented
man of letters), Amos Oz, published these remarks by the then
controversial Israeli defence minister in a pro-Labour daily, Davar.
The impression of utter callousness that Oz intended to convey
is in tune with the invectives directed against the present Israeli
government encountered in the Guardian, Le Monde, and
in speeches delivered by the European Union against Israeli aggression.
Each time the Sharon government reacts against Palestinian suicide
bombers by going after militantly anti-Israeli Palestinians, we are
reminded of the general’s lack of compassion and of his casual attitude
to inflicting destruction on the other side." [The notorious
1982 interview with current Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon
is the next link]
About
the Soft and the Delicate, by Amos Oz, (interview with Ariel Sharon
published in the Israeli daily Davar
Dec. 17, 1982), Counterpunch discussion
group; posted by Counterpunch co-founder
Jeffrey St. Clair)
"Call Israel by any name you like, call it a Judeo-Nazi state
as does Leibowitz. Why not? Better a live Judeo-Nazi than a
dead saint. I don't care whether I am like Ghadafi. I am not after
the admiration of the gentiles. I don't need their love. I don't need
to be loved by Jews like you either ... We'll hear no more of that
nonsense about the unique Jewish morality, the moral lessons of the
holocaust or about the Jews who were supposed to have emerged from
the gas chambers pure and virtuous. No more of that. The destruction
of Eyn Hilwe (and it's a pity we did not wipe out that hornet's nest
completely!), the healthy bombardment of Beirut and that tiny massacre
(can you call 500 Arabs a massacre?) in their camps which we should
have committed with our own delicate hands rather than let the Phalangists
do it, all these good deeds finally killed the bullshit talk about
a unique people and of being a light upon the nations. No more uniqueness
and no more sweetness and light. Good riddance. I personally don't
want to be any better than Khomeini or Brezhnev or Ghadafi or Assad
or Mrs. Thatcher, or even Harry Truman who killed half a million Japanese
with two fine bombs. I only want to be smarter than they are, quicker
and more efficient, not better or more beautiful than they are. Tell
me, do the baddies of this world have a bad time? If anyone tries
to touch them, the evil men cut his hands and legs off. They hunt
and catch whatever they feel like eating. They don't suffer from indigestion
and are not punished by Heaven. I want Israel to join that club. Maybe
the world will then at last begin to fear me instead of feeling sorry
for me. Maybe they will start to tremble, to fear my madness instead
of admiring my nobility. Thank god for that. Let them tremble, let
them call us a mad state. Let them understand that we are a wild country,
dangerous to our surroundings, not normal, that we might go crazy
if one of our children is murdered - just one!"
High
Court Orders IDF [Israeli army] Not to Remove Bodies from Jenin,
Haaretz, April 13, 2002
"The [Israeli] High Court ordered the Israel Defense Forces not
to remove the bodies of Palestinians killed in fighting in the Jenin
refugee camp until a hearing is held on the matter. The decision came
in response to a petition presented by attorney [Arab Israeli politician]
Jamil Dakaur from the 'Adala' organization. A three-judge panel will
discuss the issue Sunday morning. The Court also ordered the State
Prosecutor to respond to charges that the IDF buried the bodies in
a huge mass grave, as Palestinian sources claimed Thursday, and if
so, why. The sources said that the army used bulldozers to cover them
up, Palestinian sources said Thursday. The army vehemently denied
the allegations. Signers to the petition - which also included the
'Kanon' non-profit organization, MK Mohammed Barakeh (Hadash) and
MK Ahmed Tibi (Ta'al-Arab Movement for Renewal) - made the request
after Ha'aretz reported that the IDF intended to bury those identified
by the army as terrorists in a special cemetery for fallen enemy troops
in the Jordan Valley. The IDF said that the bodies of Palestinian
civilians killed in the fighting would be taken to the hospital in
Jenin and later buried. According to Tibi, removing the bodies from
the city is a violation of international law and is intended to hide
the truth from the public about the killing that occurred there."
Refugees
Flee Camp with Reports of Israeli Abuses,
Guardian (UK), April 12, 2002
"An exodus was under way yesterday from the refugee camp that
endured the bloodiest battle of Israel's military offensive, with
Palestinians bearing horrifying accounts of a systematic campaign
of destruction and abuse. Hundreds of Palestinians fled the camp yesterday,
an empty, smoking ruin resounding to bursts of Israeli machine gun
fire. They left behind entire neighbourhoods flattened to make way
for Israeli armour. Some of the wrecking missions were launched while
women and children were inside their homes. The operation began with
rocketing from helicopter gunships and bulldozers moved in to finish
the job. They also told of the use of human shields for Israeli army
patrols, and the random strafing of heavily populated civilian areas,
killing elderly women and young boys and girls. Those fleeing were
dirty, exhausted and desperately hungry. Doctors in Jenin say 15 babies
were sick after their mothers fed them powdered milk and sewage run-off
from streets where bodies were left to rot for days. A few also claimed
to have witnessed a summary execution and the dumping of the dead
- at least 150 Palestinians were killed in the camp by the Israeli
army count - into mass graves. The stories of executions and disposal
of the dead could not be verified as the Israeli army has encircled
the camp with tanks, and shot at, or arrested, journalists approaching
the area. The Guardian was among a handful of newspapers whose reporters
managed to enter the town yesterday. But the accounts of the massive
destruction of civilian homes, and of the firing on civilians, could
be confirmed as they also occurred in the town of Jenin, suggesting
a widespread and systematic pattern of human rights abuses that is
only now beginning to emerge."
Straw
Outraged By Palestinian Casualties,
Guardian (UK), April 12, 2002
"The [British] foreign secretary, Jack Straw, said today he was
'deeply shocked' by the Israeli army's disclosure that hundreds of
Palestinians had been killed in fighting at the refugee camp at Jenin.
Mr Straw said he had instructed Britain's ambassador in Tel Aviv,
Sherard Cowper-Coles, to find out the precise circumstances in which
the deaths had occurred. Earlier, Israeli army spokesman Brigadier
General Ron Kitrey told Army Radio there were apparently 'hundreds
of dead' in the Jenin refugee camp - the scene of the fiercest fighting
of the current Israeli incursion into the Palestinian-controlled areas."
[Photographs
of Israeli Atrocities Against the Palestinians People],
AmPal (Americans and Palestinians for
Peace)
"Killing in Cold Blood Israeli Aggression Against Palestinian
Children What else can be called Terror?"
Jews
Appalled By German Plan for Peace Keeping,
The Times (of London), April 11, 2002
"Germany provoked fierce criticism from the Jewish community
yesterday by suggesting that it was ready to send troops to Israel
to support a Middle East peacekeeping operation. The idea that German
soldiers, after half a century of rebuilding a relationship with Israel,
might fire on Jews brought howls of dismay from across the political
spectrum. The blocking of weapons sales to Israel and some unusually
open German criticism of Ariel Sharon, the Israeli Prime Minister,
had already strained relations, but when Gerhard Schröder, the German
Chancellor, told generals that he was considering troop deployment
in the Middle East — a taboo for Germany since the Holocaust — the
row erupted. 'It’s absolutely scandalous to think that German soldiers
could fire on Israelis,' Saloman Korn, the influential chairman
of the Frankfurt Jewish community, said, adding that Israel could
not accept foreign troops on its soil. There was no mistaking the
new sharpness of the German tone towards Israel. Norbert Blüm, a former
Christian Democrat minister, described the Israeli offences as a 'war
of annihilation.' Jürgen Möllemann, the Free Democrat Party’s deputy
chairman, said that he supported Palestinian violence. 'I would resist,
too, and use force to do so,' he said. The German Jewish community
protested, saying that such critics were 'standing shoulder-to-shoulder
with the anti-Semites.' This flushed out more German critics of Israel.
'It must be possible in Germany to criticise the military politics
of the Israeli Government without being pushed into the anti-Semitic
corner,' Guido Westerwelle, the Free Democrat chairman, said "
Norway
Criticized By the Simon Wiesenthal Center,
Norway Post, April 6, 2002
"The Simon Wiesenthal Centre in the US has criticized Norwegian
authorities for colluding with terrorists in the Middle East conflict,
and it also acccused most Norwegians of being hypocritical over the
issue. The Simon Wiesenthal Center is a leading international Jewish
human rights organization. In a letter to Prime Minister Kjell Magne
Bondevik, the centre says that Norwegians are arrogant and lack an
understanding of what is happening in the Middle East. The accusations
are in reply to the criticism of Israel's assault on civilian Palestinians
... The Simon Wiesenthal Center is one of the largest international
Jewish human rights organizations in the world. It claims a membership
of 400,000 world wide."
Israel
Buries the Bodies, But Cannot Hide the Evidence,
Independent (UK), April 13, 2002
"Israel was trying to bury the evidence in Jenin refugee camp
yesterday, but it cannot bury the terrible crime it has committed:
a slaughter in which Palestinian civilians were cut down alongside
the armed defenders of the camp. Israeli tanks circled journalists
menacingly as foreign reporters tried to get into the camp, cutting
off their approach. But a man who had just fled the camp said he had
seen Israeli soldiers burying the bodies of the dead in a mass grave.
'I saw it all with my own eyes,' said the man. 'I saw people bleeding
to death in the streets. I saw a 10-year-old child lying dead. There
was a big hole in his side and his arm had been blown away. 'I saw
them burying the bodies. They started work on the grave a few days
ago. I recognised some of the bodies in it. I can give you the names.'
And he reeled them off: 'Mohammed Hamed, Nidal Nubam and Mustafa Shnewa'.
He said the mass grave he saw was in a neighbourhood called Harat
Al-Hawashiya. 'They dug a big hole in the ground. I saw them filling
it in today. They had a big bulldozer pushing dirt in on top of it.'
And so the grieving of Jenin will not be certain where their relatives
lie. They will not return to bury their dead, however – the Israeli
army will have done that to keep the devastating sight of the carnage
away from the eyes of the waiting world. Yesterday, though, they were
unable to stifle the evil smell. The reek of putrefying bodies wafted
out of the narrow, rubble-strewn alleys which were barred for a fifth
day to international aid agencies trying to send ambulances and doctors
to evacuate the many wounded, and recover the dead. One after another,
international officials, angered by Israel's rampant violations of
the Fourth Geneva Convention and the human misery that has resulted,
confided to The Independent yesterday that they had reached
the inevitable conclusion: a crime has been committed which Israel
is trying to cover up. 'It is clear they have something to hide –
that is the bottom line,' said one senior diplomatic source."
Sharon
Teaches Powell a Lesson over Breakfast,
Telegraph (UK), April 14, 2002
"An hour later, Mr Powell was sitting around another table in
the residence with a group of ministers representing the parties in
Israel's broad-based coalition government, gathered to present a united
and formidable front for the visitor. Effi Eitam, a controversial
'hawk', who had only been a member of the cabinet for a few days,
turned to Mr Powell and said forcefully: 'You have had seven months
in Afghanistan and you have not finished your work. We only want eight
weeks for our military operation, so why not let us finish the job?'
David Levy, the rough-edged former foreign minister, was also
in combative mood. 'Sometimes we hear from people in the States that
the Israeli prime minister is divided from his people, but I can tell
you he was elected by the majority of Israelis and now we are all
behind him. 'The world tells us that Arafat was elected by the Palestinian
people and because of that we do not have the right to fight against
his terror. Let me remind you that Saddam Hussein was also elected.
Does that mean that you cannot fight against Saddam?' As the Israelis
gave full vent to their anger, Mr Powell sat back and listened, like
a dazed man who has strayed into a minefield. Later, as he emerged
into the bright sunshine for a press conference, a chastened Mr Powell
had dropped the confrontational tone adopted by Washington in previous
days, which had seen President Bush demanding an 'immediate withdrawal'
of the Israeli army from Jenin and other West Bank Palestinian towns.
Instead, Mr Powell emphasised his close 'personal friendship' with
Mr Sharon as the Israeli leader glowed with satisfaction beside
him. When the nervous Hebrew translator inadvertently referred to
the 'United States of Israel', there were knowing smiles all round."
The
Camp that Became a Slaughterhouse,
The Independent (UK), April, 14, 2002
"A woman with her leg all but ripped off by a helicopter rocket,
the mangled remains hanging on by a thread of skin as she slowly bleeds
to death. A 10-year-old boy lying dead in the street, his arm blown
off and a great hole in his side. A mother shot dead when she ran
into the street to scream for help for her dying son. The wounded
left to die slowly, in horrible agony, because the ambulances were
not allowed in to treat them. A terrible crime has been committed
by Israel in Jenin refugee camp, and the world is turning a blind
eye. Colin Powell, the US Secretary of State, visited the scene of
a suicide bombing that murdered six Israelis in Jerusalem, but he
did not visit Jenin, where the Israelis admit they killed at least
100 Palestinians. The Israel army claims all of the dead were armed
men, that it took special care to avoid civilian casualties. But we
saw the helicopter rockets rain down on desperately crowded areas:
civilian casualties could not have been prevented. The Israeli army
sealed off the entire area around Jenin yesterday, arresting journalists
who ventured into it. That is because they have something to hide
in Jenin: the bodies. The Israeli army has told the Israeli courts
that it will not start burying the bodies until Sunday. But there
are abundant eyewitnesses who say they have already seen the soldiers
piling the bodies in mass graves. Hiding the bodies is what Slobodan
Milosevic did in Kosovo. Either way, the Palestinians are not allowed
to bury their own dead, because Israel does not want the world to
see what happened inside Jenin refugee camp. The grieving have no
way of knowing where to find the bodies of those they have lost. For
nine days, Jenin camp became a slaughterhouse. Fifteen thousand Palestinians
lived in a square kilometre in the camp, a packed warren of narrow
lanes. Thousands of terrified civilians, women and children, cowered
inside their homes while the Israeli helicopters rained down rockets
on them and tanks fired shells into the camp. The wounded were left
to die. The Israeli army refused to allow ambulances in to treat them,
which is a war crime under the Geneva Conventions. The Red Cross has
publicly said people have died because Israel blocked the ambulances.
Slobodan Milosevic is on trial in the Hague for breaking the Geneva
Conventions, while Ariel Sharon shakes Colin Powell's hand
for the television cameras. The Geneva Conventions are in tatters
in Israel."
Pro-Israel Rallies Bring Out Thousands in US,
Jerusalem Post, April 14, 2002
"Two pro-Israel rallies brought out thousands of New Yorkers
Sunday in mass protests against terrorism as tens of thousands more
made arrangements to demonstrate for Israel in front of the US Capitol
today. Today's rally, the brainchild of the president of the Coalition
for Jewish Concerns-Amcha, Rabbi Avi Weiss, is expected to
be the largest gathering of American Jews since 1987, when hundreds
of thousands gathered in Washington in support of Soviet Jewry. 'Rallying
at this time is absolutely critical,' said Weiss. 'I was just
in Israel last week, and everywhere you go, people ask, 'Do American
Jews really care?'' In New York, many Jewish organizations planned
to close shop today and bus their staff and supporters to Washington,
and some day schools and yeshivas cancelled classes to send their
students to the rally. By Friday, over 700 buses were booked for New
York demonstrators, according to the Jewish Community Relations Council.
As of Sunday morning, there was limited availability on public trains
and buses from New York to Washington, and supporters were booked
to drive and fly in from as far away as Alabama, California, and Alaska."
Tutu Calls US Soft on Israel,
Boston Globe, April 14, 2002
"Likening Israel's treatment of Palestinians to the oppression
of blacks by the white apartheid government in South Africa, Nobel
laureate Desmond Tutu yesterday chided the Bush administration for
being too soft on prime minister Ariel Sharon ... Tutu said the Bush
administration should demand Israel withdraw from the Gaza and the
West Bank, adding that Israel's isolation of Yasir Arafat was ''bizarre
and humiliating.' Speaking earlier to a gathering of about 500 peace
activists and members of the pro-Palestinian group Sabeel at the church,
he urged a movement in the United States to 'put out a clarion call
to the people and the government of Israel.' 'An unjust Israeli government
- no matter how powerful - will ultimately fall,' he said. Jewish
leaders reacted strongly to Tutu's remarks. 'It's tragic that a person
of his moral credentials would sacrifice them with such an ugly slur,'
said Rob Leikind, director of the New England chapter of the Anti-Defamation
League. 'Israel is in a simple fight for survival. It's a sad day
for all of us when people engage in that kind of hyperbole' ... Tutu
said he also is 'saddened' by the apparent lack of sympathy for the
Palestinian cause in America and by the Bush administration's apparent
unwillingness to rebuff Israeli interests at home. 'Somehow, the Israeli
government is placed on a pedestal, where to criticize them is to
be immediately dubbed as anti-Semitic,' he said. 'The Jewish lobby
is powerful. Very powerful. So what? This is God's world.'"
Why
Is This Happening?,
Washington Post, April 14, 2002
"The latest suicide bomber was said to be from Jenin -- the town
that Israeli troops have most thoroughly and bloodily scoured during
the past two weeks. Israeli spokesmen say the operation killed 100
or more Palestinian fighters in the town's refugee camp, including
a couple of militant leaders, and uncovered stores of illegal weapons
and explosives. That may be true -- but it's also clear that innocent
Palestinians have died there as well. The Fashafsheh family, for example
-- a mother, father and 9-year-old son who perished when an Israeli
bulldozer brought down their house on top of them. Palestinians say
hundreds of others like them died, shot by snipers or blown up by
rocket and tank fire or bulldozed in their homes. But no one really
knows how many; Israel so far has denied access to journalists and
all other outsiders, and Palestinians reportedly have already buried
some bodies in mass graves. In many other Palestinian towns, innocent
people are suffering and dying for trying to live their daily lives.
Ramallah housewife Manal Sofran was shot in the head by Israeli soldiers
as she leaned out of her house to call her family to dinner. Washington-born
Suraide Abu Gharbiya, 21, was gunned down as she held her nine-month-old
baby in her arms. In Bethlehem, a mentally impaired man who worked
at the Church of the Nativity was shot and killed by soldiers when
he wandered outside the church under siege. Journalists and human
rights groups tell of Israeli soldiers torturing and deliberately
humiliating the middle-aged shopkeepers and clerks the army has been
detaining in mass roundups. According to Human Rights Watch, Palestinian
civilians have been forced at gunpoint to open suspicious packages,
knock on doors of suspects and accompany troops on raids."
Wolfowitz
Gets Cold Reception at Pro-Israel Rally,
San Francisco Chronicle, April 15, 2002
"A Bush administration official was interrupted and booed Monday
when he told thousands of people gathered at the Capitol for a pro-Israel
rally that Palestinians as well as Israelis have been victims of Mideast
violence. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz was drowned
out by chants of 'no more Arafat' and booed as he told the crowd that
'innocent Palestinians are suffering and dying as well. It is critical
that we recognize and acknowledge that fact.' Wolfowitz, the
second-ranked official at the Pentagon, was one of dozens of speakers
at what sponsors said was the largest pro-Israel rally ever staged
in this country ... Among the other speakers were former Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Housing Minister Natan
Sharansky, former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, House Majority
Leader Dick Armey, R-Texas, AFL-CIO President John Sweeney and New
York Gov. George Pataki ... The rally was sponsored by the Conference
of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations and the United
Jewish Communities."
Grim
Accounts from Jenin Survivors. Growing Testimony That Human Rights
Violations Accompanied Israel Victory at Camp,
San Francisco Chronicle, April 15, 2002
"Lukea Tomei could only watch through a peephole as one neighbor
was shot, his arms in the air. She cried out when she saw an elderly
woman blasted by a sniper. But she could stay still no longer when
she saw a little girl wandering through a mine-filled street. 'The
soldiers told me not to go out, but I didn't listen to them,' said
Tomei, a Palestinian nurse who rushed outside to snatch the girl to
safety. 'I could not sit by any longer.' Nearly two weeks after the
Israeli army launched the bloodiest battle in the West Bank since
the 1967 Middle East War, there is growing testimony that its victory
at the Jenin refugee camp was marred by human-rights violations. Israeli
soldiers shot unarmed civilians, bulldozed people alive and blocked
access to medical care, according to more than a dozen witnesses who
spoke yesterday in a temporary shelter just outside the smoldering
camp ... Separately yesterday, Israel's High Court ruled that the
military could begin removing bodies of Palestinians killed in the
assault. The court said that the dead would have to be turned over
to the Palestinians and that representatives of the International
Committee for the Red Cross and the Red Crescent Society would be
allowed to witness the process. Initially, the Israeli army had announced
it alone would take the bodies to a remote grave site. The petition
to the High Court was filed by Israeli Arab lawmakers and human rights
groups, who said Israel was attempting to hide the number of dead."
Amid
the Ruins of Jenin, the Grisly Evidence of a War Crime,
The Independent (UK), April 16, 2002
"A monstrous war crime that Israel has tried to cover up for
a fortnight has finally been exposed. Its troops have caused devastation
in the centre of the Jenin refugee camp, reached yesterday by The
Independent, where thousands of people are still living amid the ruins.
A residential area roughly 160,000 square yards about a third of a
mile wide has been reduced to dust. Rubble has been shovelled by bulldozers
into 30ft piles. The sweet and ghastly reek of rotting human bodies
is everywhere, evidence that it is a human tomb. The people, who spent
days hiding in basements crowded into single rooms as the rockets
pounded in, say there are hundreds of corpses, entombed beneath the
dust, under a field of debris, criss-crossed with tank and bulldozer
treadmarks ... We stared at a mound of debris. Here, [Kamal Anis,
a local Palestinian] said, he saw the Israeli soldiers pile 30 bodies
beneath a half-wrecked house. When the pile was complete, they bulldozed
the building, bringing its ruins down on the corpses. Then they flattened
the area with a tank. We could not see the bodies. But we could smell
them. A few days ago, we might not have believed Kamal Anis. But the
descriptions given by the many other refugees who escaped from Jenin
camp were understated, not, as many feared and Israel encouraged us
to believe, exaggerations. Their stories had not prepared me for what
I saw yesterday. I believe them now."
A Mother's Warning, and a Fatal Shot Though Combat in Ramallah Is
Over, Army Killing of Civilians Has Continued, by Daniel Williams,
Washington Post, April 12, 2002
"The Palestinian most recently killed by Israeli soldiers in
Ramallah was Manal Sofran. She was a housewife shot in the head on
Wednesday, neighbors said, while calling her husband Sami and their
four children to come in from the garden of their three-story apartment
building near Chicken Street. She leaned out from the glass-enclosed
sunroom, a common feature of Palestinian houses from the 1950s and
'60s. She spied five soldiers by a nearby wall, the neighbors recalled,
and feared they might shoot at moving objects ... Israeli soldiers
strictly enforce a curfew, to the point that someone who sticks his
or her head out a window risks losing it ...Sofran's death and incidents
like it raise a different question. How abundantly has this operation
fed a lust for revenge -- not merely among armed fighters' relatives
and associates, but also among Palestinians related to civilian victims?
In Ramallah, civilians speak most heatedly not about militia losses
but about such killings: shooting a woman in her home on a clear,
quiet day, and hitting the mark with two bullets. Palestinians complain
that the United States has written off Palestinian civilian casualties
as incidental, even in the early days of the uprising when Palestinians
were shot down by the dozens while throwing stones at Israeli troops.
'You foreigners make much of Israeli civilian deaths,' said Bashir
Abu Walid, a neighbor of the dead woman. 'Every Israeli death is a
big event. But we are just statistics. Because a soldier does it,
it is not terrorism. Why not?'"
Inside
the Camp of the Dead,
Times (of London), April 16, 2002
"The refugees I had interviewed in recent days while trying to
enter the camp were not lying. If anything, they underestimated the
the carnage and the horror. Rarely, in more than a decade of war reporting
from Bosnia, Chechnya, Sierra Leone, Kosovo, have I seen such deliberate
destruction, such disrespect for human life. This was not only a town
of fighters, as Israeli soldiers told me. It was a town of women,
children and old men, who have seen the camp grow into a warren of
ramshackle homes over half a century. Amnesty International called
for an immediate investigation into 'the killings of hundreds of Palestinian',
saying crucial evidence may be destroyed as Israel'continues to impede
access'. Throughout the camp, which the Israelis called a production
line for terrorists, there is the stench of death, of bodies that
have been rotting in the sun for days. Everyone who survived the fiercest
battle of Israel’s Operation Defensive Shield has a terrible story
to tell. They take your hand and lead you into their houses across
bulldozed mounds of rubble including photo albums, clothing, toys
and pillowcases. There, there are more bodies, burnt or twisted grotesquely,
caught off guard by sudden death. Nothing prepares you for the smallness
of a dead body. The dead are everywhere ... Yoni Wolff, 26,
an Israeli lieutenant who has spent weeks here, told me that no deliberate
destruction had taken place and that the soldiers had killed only
terrorists. But the hundreds believed dead were not all fighters.
Buried under the rubble are the bodies of women and children whose
houses caved in around them.'We destroyed the infrastructure of terror,'
Yoni boasted."
Sharon Producing 'Worldwide Anti-Israelism': Former French PM,
Arabia.com (from AFP), April 15, 2002
"Former French premier Michel Rocard accused Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon of 'producing world-wide anti-Israelism.' In a
long open letter to Sharon published in the daily Le Figaro
Monday, Rocard wrote: 'You are producing world-wide anti-Israelism
and people like me, who have fought anti-Semitism since they were
very young, are powerless to hold back the torrent of anger and hatred
to which you have opened the floodgates.' 'You are waging a war that
you cannot win,' Rocard continued. 'Each action by (the Israeli army)
creates a dozen new terrorists (...) Well, there are two million Palestinians
(...) How many will you have to kill? Several hundred thousand? Half
a million?' The former French prime minister suggested that the international
community would not permit this. Addressing 'the head of those in
power in Israel' and not Sharon personally, Rocard went on:
'You have chosen force, you could have not done so. This has a price.
(...) The first element to pay, the most immediate, is the complete
destruction of any hope -- and that is now done.' The Socialist former
premier said Sharon had not learnt the lessons of lost wars by the
'dominant' countries like France in Indochina and Algeria, the United
States in Vietnam or the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, which had refused
to negotiate with their adversaries. 'Where in history have you seen
that a warlord can choose his adversary?' asked Rocard accusing Sharon,
if not wanting to kill Yasser Arafat, of 'working on paralyzing him,
humiliating him and trying to exile him.'"
Israel
Faces Rage Over 'Massacre,'
Guardian (UK), April 17, 2002
"Israel's international reputation slumped to its lowest point
for two decades yesterday, amid condemnation in Britain and Europe
of the Israeli army's behaviour at the Palestinian refugee camp in
Jenin in the West Bank. There were calls for a United Nations-led
inquiry into allegations that the Israeli army carried out a massacre
and that its soldiers were guilty of war crimes. Senior politicians
lined up in London and Brussels to express outrage. The European Union's
external relations commissioner, Chris Patten, in an interview with
the Guardian, said Israel must accept a UN investigation of alleged
atrocities against Palestinians or face 'colossal damage' to its reputation.
In a Commons debate, Gerald Kaufman, the veteran Labour MP
who is Britain's most prominent Jewish parliamentarian, launched a
ferocious attack on the Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon,
denouncing him as a 'war criminal'. With MPs on both sides of the
Commons condemning the Israeli incursion, Mr Kaufman said Mr
Sharon had "ordered his troops to use methods of barbarism
against the Palestinians". Expressing fear that something dreadful
had happened in Jenin, he said: 'It is time to remind Sharon
that the Star of David belongs to all Jews and not to his repulsive
government. His actions are staining the Star of David with blood.'
With the Israeli army still blocking full access to Jenin, it is impossible
to establish even a rough body count. However, both Amnesty and the
New York-based Human Rights Watch yesterday called for inquiries ...
US support for Israel remains strong compared with Europe, where anger
against Israel reached levels not seen since the massacre at Sabra
and Shatila refugee camps in the Lebanon in 1982. In the Commons,
even the foreign secretary, Jack Straw - in recent months a strong
defender in public of Israel - joined in criticism. "
What
Israel Has Done, by Edward Said,
The Nation, May 6, 2002
"The monstrous transformation of an entire people by a formidable
and feared propaganda machine into little more than militants and
terrorists has allowed not just Israel's military but its fleet of
writers and defenders to efface a terrible history of injustice, suffering
and abuse in order to destroy the civil existence of the Palestinian
people with impunity. Gone from public memory are the destruction
of Palestinian society in 1948 and the creation of a dispossessed
people; the conquest of the West Bank and Gaza and their military
occupation since 1967; the invasion of Lebanon in 1982, with its 17,500
Lebanese and Palestinian dead and the Sabra and Shatila massacres;
the continuous assault on Palestinian schools, refugee camps, hospitals,
civil installations of every kind. What antiterrorist purpose is served
by destroying the building and then removing the records of the ministry
of education; the Ramallah municipality; the Central Bureau of Statistics;
various institutes specializing in civil rights, health, culture and
economic development; hospitals, radio and TV stations? Isn't it clear
that Sharon is bent not only on breaking the Palestinians but on trying
to eliminate them as a people with national institutions? In such
a context of disparity and asymmetrical power it seems deranged to
keep asking the Palestinians, who have no army, air force, tanks or
functioning leadership, to renounce violence, and to require no comparable
limitation on Israel's actions. It certainly obscures Israel's systematic
use of lethal force against unarmed civilians, copiously documented
by all the major human rights organizations. Even the matter of suicide
bombers, which I have always opposed, cannot be examined from a viewpoint
that permits a hidden racist standard to value Israeli lives over
the many more Palestinian lives that have been lost, maimed, distorted
and foreshortened by longstanding military occupation and the systematic
barbarity openly used by Sharon against Palestinians since the beginning
of his career."
Outrage
Over Claire Rayner's Attack on Israel,
The Independent (UK), April 21, 2002
"Claire Rayner, Britain's best-known agony aunt, has outraged
the Jewish establishment by declaring a loathing of Israel and an
apparent empathy with Palestinian suicide bombers. Ms Rayner, 71,
who was born Jewish but has long been a self-proclaimed atheist, has
said that the Jewish people's claim to a historic homeland was 'a
load of crap'. The comments from the 'mother of all agony aunts' have
infuriated the Board of Deputies of British Jews. Only last week it
castigated another television personality, the poet and Oxford University
don Tom Paulin, for suggesting in an interview that American-born
settlers in Israel were like Nazis who should be 'shot dead'. Mr Paulin,
in a letter to today's Independent on Sunday, says his views have
been distorted. Ms Rayner told this newspaper: 'I have never had any
attachment to Israel. The only time I went there I loathed the country.
People were abominably rude. I am appalled by the right wing hawkishness
of this government. What upsets me even more is so many of the constituents
seem to approve of what Sharon is doing. People say the Jews have
a historic right to live on the land how can they? What a load of
crap. You could also say Sephardic Jews have a right to Spain.' Ms
Rayner, the president of the British Humanist Association declares
a firm preference for a world without national boundaries. She added:
'If you treat a group of people the way Palestinians have been treated
they will use the only weapon they have which is their individual
lives. This is why there are suicide bombers.'"
Israel
Winning Broad Support From U.S. Right,
New York Times, April 20, 2002
"The strongly pro-Israel sentiment marks a profound and telling
shift inside the Republican Party, political strategists say. With
Jews mostly voting Democratic, Republican presidents for decades had
been freer to break with Israel. Dwight D. Eisenhower refused to back
a British, French and Israeli attack on Egypt after it nationalized
the Suez Canal. Mr. Bush's father's administration repeatedly clashed
with Israel. But now, Mr. [Gary] Bauer, 55, the president of a research
organization called American Values, often presses Israel's case in
a daily e-mail message that makes its way to about 100,000 Christian
conservatives. Mr. [Irving] Kristol, 49, who edits The
Weekly Standard, has criticized Mr. Bush's Middle East policy
in his magazine and in memorandums fired off by the Project for the
American Century, a foreign policy group that he heads ... From Jewish
neoconservatives like Mr. Kristol to Christian and social conservatives
like Mr. Bauer, from the free-market conservatives of The Wall Street
Journal editorial page to the talk radio host Rush Limbaugh, has come
the same sharp message ... The seeds for the new Republican thinking
were planted under Ronald Reagan when his robust anticommunism and
advocacy of a strong missile defense drew to his side a group of influential,
pro-Israel neoconservatives from the Democratic Party like Jeane J.
Kirkpatrick, his United Nations ambassador, and Richard Perle,
an assistant secretary of defense. Mr. Reagan, who was strongly pro-Israel,
also paved the way for the ascendancy of the Christian right in the
Republican Party ... 'For the first time in probably the history of
the Republican Party a significantly pro-Israel constituency has to
catch the eye of the White House,' said Marshall Wittmann,
who has an unusual perspective as a Jewish conservative who was once
a lobbyist for the Christian Coalition. Republicans attribute the
conservative support for Israel to many factors, including the influence
of largely Jewish neoconservatives and the rise of the Christian right,
with its belief that the Bible mandates support for Israel. The Likud
Party in Israel also built ties to conservatives. After the Sept.
11 attacks, other conservatives who embrace a hawkish foreign policy
came to see a stand with Israel as important strategy in the war against
terrorism. The departure from Republican ranks of Patrick J. Buchanan
and his followers also muted the voices of conservatives who were
more critical of Israel. 'That was the part of the movement most skeptical
of Israel and most pro-Arab,' said Richard Lowry, the editor of National
Review. 'They are effectively out of the picture.' Mr. Buchanan advocated
closer ties between the United States and Iraq and Iran, and his past
writings were criticized by some as anti-Semitic, a charge he vehemently
denied. In the 1960's and earlier, the conservative movement included
elements, like the John Birch Society, that were viewed as anti-Jewish.
These elements, too, have waned."
Are
the Israelis Guilty of Mass Murder?
The Scotsman (Scotland), April 19, 2002
"They left as departing heroes, waving victory salutes and grinning
as they went. But even as Israel’s forces pulled out of the Jenin
refugee camp on the West Bank, relief workers were claiming the carnage
and destruction left behind was like an earthquake. They spoke of
a war crime on the scale of the Bosnia and Kosovo wars. The United
Nations, allowed access after 12 days during which ambulances were
turned away and scores of injured bleed to death, struggled to find
words to describe the devastation. Terje Roed-Larsen, the UN special
envoy, said simply: 'We have expert people here who have been in war
zones and earthquakes and they say they have never seen anything like
it. It is horrifying beyond belief.' The UN was at last beginning
to extract the corpses and search for survivors beneath the rubble,
as well as provide food, water and shelter to camp residents. Its
officials were unable to bring to mind a time when they had been so
obstructed as they had been by the Israelis. Peter Hansen, head of
the United Nations Relief and Works Agency , who had served in the
Balkans, said: 'I and my colleagues working in crisis situations for
decades do not recall a situation where co-operation from the authorities
has been less than what we have experienced from the Israeli government.
It is beyond any human decency to let ambulances, food and water stand
outside the camp, as has been the case.' Mr Hansen said soldiers had
shot up the UN clinic in the camp. Destroyed, along with everything
else, was a storage container for vaccines. He was shaken by what
he had seen: 'I today have seen decomposed bodies dug out. One was
an 11-year-old child, judging from the size of his rib-cage.' In a
sense, what Mr Hansen was seeing was the logical outcome of the vow
by the prime minister, Ariel Sharon, to 'wipe out the last
terror cell' in the West Bank. He made similar comments as defence
minister before the 1982 Sabra and Shatila refugee camp massacres."
What Really Happened
at Jenin,
(Before and after aerial photos of the Palestinian refugee camp levelled
by Israeli invasion)
etherzone.com
European Poll Faults US for Its Policy
in the Mideast,
by Adam Clymer, New York Times, April
19, 2002
"People in Europe, while sympathetic to recent American efforts
in the Middle East, strongly feel that the United States has not done
enough to bring about a peace settlement, according to coordinated
polls in Britain, France, Germany and Italy. A key reason for the
European unhappiness appears to be a much greater sympathy for the
Palestinians than is found in the United States. The survey, conducted
by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, showed that
majorities of 71 percent in France, 67 percent in Italy, 64 percent
in Germany and 57 percent in Britain said the United States was not
"doing as much as it can to bring about a peace settlement between
the Israelis and the Palestinians." The respondents, about 1,000 people
in each country, were asked, "In the dispute between Israel and the
Palestinians, which side do you sympathize with more?" In none of
the European countries did more sympathize with Israel, while in a
companion poll in the United Sates, 41 percent sided with Israel to
13 percent for the Palestinians. The closest European division in
the poll -- conducted with the International Herald Tribune and the
Council on Foreign Relations -- came in Germany. There 24 percent
sided with Israel and 26 percent with the Palestinians, a difference
that fell within the poll's margin of sampling error of plus or minus
three percentage points. But in the other three nations, the Palestinian
side was preferred, 36 percent to 19 percent in France, 30 to 14 in
Italy and 28 to 17 in Britain."
Daschle
Says US Must Support Israel,
New York Times, April 22, 2002
"Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle told the largest pro-Israel
lobbying group Monday that U.S. support for Israel must be absolute.
'Israel has always had fair-weather friends. What it needs now are
foul-weather friends,' he told the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee, which is holding its annual convention in Washington. 'As
long as I am majority leader of the United States Senate, we will
be a friend to Israel in fair weather and in foul,' he said."
Amnesty
Accuses Israel of Jenin War Crimes,
Reuters, April 22, 2002
"Amnesty International accused Israel Monday of serious human
rights abuses during its occupation of the Palestinian refugee camp
in Jenin and pressed for a full investigation to see if they amounted
to war crimes. Basing its allegations on statements from Palestinians
and what it said was evidence from its own observers who entered the
West Bank town minutes after the Israeli withdrawal, Amnesty said
it had clear evidence of serious crimes. 'We have concluded, on a
preliminary basis, that very serious violations of human rights were
committed. We are talking here (about) war crimes,' Javier Zuniga,
the human rights group's regional director, told a news conference.
'We believe that Israel has a case to answer' ...'The claim that only
fighters were killed is simply not true,' [forensic pathologist Derrick]Pounder
said. 'In Jenin, there have certainly been mass killings -- both of
combatants and civilians.' Pounder said the refugee camp should now
be treated as a crime scene, and a full international team of investigators
similar to The Hague Tribunal for former Yugoslavia be allowed in
to try and piece together exactly what happened."
Le
Pen's triumph: a message to Muslims to keep quiet,
Haaretz (Israeli newspaper), April 23,
2002
"[Roger] Cukierman, 65, is a professional banker. More precisely,
as chairman of the 'Edmund de Rothschild' group, he is a very senior
figure in the banking sphere ... He explains: 'The Holocaust happened
60 years ago; and here are the Jews proving nowadays that they too
act brutally; and thus the Jews are no longer in a situation wherein
they can preach morality. The passage of time has apparently taken
its toll; and so were it not for the campaign to restore Jewish property,
Europe would stop feeling guilty and `return to normalcy' ... Cukierman
does not hold back criticism of leftist members of France's Jewish
community, including one of his predecessors at CRIF's top post, Theo
Klein, who refused to take part in a large rally organized by the
French Jewry two weeks ago, to protest double standards in responses
to anti-Semitism, and express support of Israel. These leftists chose
to stage a simultaneous rally which was limited to opposition of anti-Semitism.
'I said [at the time] that while France suffered from anti-Semitism,
there had not been a single Jew killed in these incidents, whereas
125 people were killed in Israel in the month of March alone. Thus,
I felt that decency compelled us to express support for Israel. The
fact is that our constituency voted with its feet: About a third of
French Jewry, some 140,000 people, took part in this rally. Only 1,000
people turned up for the left-wing demonstration.'"
Gulf
Press Slams Bush, Tells Arab Leaders to Ditch 'Friendship' with US,
Arabia.com, April 20, 2002
"Gulf newspapers urged Arab governments to rethink their supposed
'friendship' with the United States after President George W. Bush
stood squarely behind Israel in its current bloody conflict with the
Palestinians. 'Until when will we keep talking about 'the American
friend'?' asked Al-Ittihad of the United Arab Emirates ... Qatar's
Al-Watan also urged Arab states to 'reconsider their attitude to Washington,
which has been discredited by its support for the criminal Zionist
entity.' There is no point being friendly to a US administration that
is totally under 'Zionist' influence, the paper said. In Kuwait and
Saudi Arabia, leader writers and columnists lashed out at Bush for
describing Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon as a 'man of peace.'
'The martyr is now a murderer, the killer is a victim, the occupation
is security, resistance is terrorism, and Sharon is a man of peace,'
Kuwait's Al-Rai Al-Aam wrote sarcastically. 'We're not asking Bush
to champion the Palestinian cause; we're only asking him to uphold
American values,' the paper said."
Jewish Voters
Gravitating Toward GOP,
FoxNews, April 24, 2002
"Jewish Americans make up only 2.5 percent of the U.S. population
but they vote in higher percentages than any other minority group
in the country. Typically, they are known as staunch Democrats, but
as more of the traditional left of the Democratic Party gravitate
toward the Palestinian cause, American Jews are indicating that they
place more trust in the party of George W. Bush. 'Prior to Sept. 11
on my radio show, a lot of people would call and say, ‘Rabbi, how
dare you support a Republican,’' offered Rabbi Chaim Mentz,
a Los Angeles radio talk show host. 'Now, all of a sudden, after Sept.
11, they notice there is a moral clarity which America never showed,
which is an alliance with our brethren that may be living in Israel,'
he added. At a recent pro-Israel festival in Los Angeles, Jewish American
voters signed up to support the Republican Party ... A poll of Jewish
voters shows that President Bush’s approval ratings among the Jewish
community are over 80 percent. Political analyst Susan Estrich
said this is an opportune time for the Republicans to start dipping
into the wide support Democrats receive from Jewish Americans. 'Right
now George Bush has an opportunity that no GOP president has had in
our lifetimes — to change the dynamic of the Jewish vote in America,'
she said."
American
Jews Open Checkbooks in Response to Campaign for Israel,
JTA (Jewish Telegraphic Agency), April
23, 2002
"At the New York office of Friends of the Israel Defense Forces,
phone calls from people seeking to make contributions or volunteer
increased an estimated 500 percent in the past month. Hadassah: The
Women´s Zionist Organization of America, which raises money for Jerusalem´s
largest hospital, has already raised $8.4 million of a special $28
million campaign for its emergency medical center. The Jewish National
Fund, which is running a special campaign in addition to its regular
campaign, has already raised $19 million this year, 26 percent ahead
of where it was at this time last year. And Israel Bonds, which pays
for Israeli government infrastructure, reports investments 70 percent
ahead of last year at this time. As major Jewish and Israel-related
philanthropies launch emergency campaigns for Israel, American Jews
are apparently heeding the call and pulling out their checkbooks.
The Jewish federation system, which has raised more than $100 million
in emergency dollars for Israel in the past few weeks, expects to
raise considerably more ... Gary Tobin, president of the San Francisco-based
Institute for Jewish and Community Research, ... said, 'There is no
question that we are in a real crisis.' He said he expects all giving
to Israel — whether to centralized or specialized groups — to increase.
'It´s a plain and simple response. People are concerned. They´re afraid.
They are desperate to do something to show support for Israel.'"
The Intifada Reaches the Ivory Tower,
Haaretz, April 25, 2002
"The first time that the international scientific community imposed
a boycott on a state was during the apartheid regime in South Africa.
The second time is being considered at present, and now the boycott
is directed against Israel and its policy in the territories. Several
manifestos calling for the imposition of a boycott, on various levels,
have been published in recent days by professors from abroad; a number
of Israeli scientists have signed the manifestos, arousing a great
deal of anger on Israeli campuses. In the United States, students
are applying pressure on the universities, demanding that they stop
supporting companies and foundations that cooperate with Israel. The
initiative began with students from the University of California at
Berkeley half a year ago, and recently it has spread to universities
such as Princeton. Members of prestigious scientific bodies, such
as the Norwegian Academy of Sciences, have condemned Israel's actions
in the territories, and criticized their Israeli colleagues for their
indifference to the situation of Palestinian researchers, and the
damage to academic institutions in the Palestinian Authority. According
to Israeli diplomatic sources, steps to have Israel join several large
European projects have been postponed until further notice ... The
first manifesto published abroad was initiated by a pair of British
researchers, Professors Hilary and Steven Rose of Britain's Open University.
The manifesto suggests that European research institutes stop treating
Israel like a European country in their scientific relations with
it, until Israel acts according to UN resolutions and opens serious
peace negotiations with the Palestinians. (Israel enjoys the status
of a European country in many European research programs.) The manifesto
was signed by over 270 European scientists, including about 10 Israelis.
"
French
FM: US Jewry more 'intransigent' than Sharon,
Jerusalem Post, April 24, 2002
"In order to pressure Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to show
more flexibility, the EU should try to whittle away at American Jewry's
support for the prime minister, French Foreign Minister Hubert Vedrine
said in a closed meeting Monday. In the world according to Vedrine,
who as a result of the recent French elections is on his way out of
office, Sharon is an obstacle to the peace process bolstered in his
intransigence by American Jewry, which Vedrine said is essentially
more Sharon than Sharon. These diplomatic insights were
shared by Vedrine at a closed meeting with the EU and Mediterranean
state foreign ministers in Valencia, Spain, on Monday night. In comments
which diplomatic officials who we
|